Picture
We don’t eat raspberries in the winter. 


It’s simple. They don’t grow the in the winter. We eat locally as much as possible, so that means if we haven’t canned or frozen raspberries from last summer’s harvest we’ll wait until they ripen again. 

Eating locally isn’t a trend. It’s a return to a way of life that makes sense. 


Why is it worth the trouble?

1. Save energy and reduce your carbon footprint. Food travels an average of 1,500 miles before reaching the consumer's fork. Combination foods travel even farther. One study found that the sugar, yogurt and strawberries in fruit yogurt traveled over 2,200 miles.

Buying locally can slash these numbers by more than 90 percent. It isn't hard to buy local yogurt, honey and fruit to mix up a homemade snack. This also cuts down on global warming gasses, making the end product more sustainable. In fact, the World Watch Institute reports that a typical North American meal uses up to 17 times more fossil fuel than a locally sourced meal.

2. Preserve flavor. Because today's crops are grown to be shipped long distances, growers plant varieties that will survive transport best. That means the peaches are not grown for flavor but hardiness, the tomatoes are chosen for their thick skins and standardized size. Growers pick produce long before natural ripening. The taste suffers even more during cold storage and shipping. As a result, who really wants to eat the cardboard-like fruits and vegetables available most of the year at the supermarket? Few of us know what straight-off-the-vine grapes taste like, not many of us have ever tried freshly picked sweet corn or cherries still warm from the sun.

But when you buy locally, you get a powerhouse of flavor. Farmers can pick the fruits and vegetables at peak ripeness because their customers are an hour or two away. The taste will convince you that buying foods in season from local growers is the only choice worth making.

3. Gain nutrients. According to USDA data, random samples of fruits and vegetables show 26 percent less calcium, 36 percent less iron and 29 percent less vitamin C compared to 1975. Not only do food crops need to reach peak nutritional levels by fully ripening on the plant, recent studies have shown that organic farming methods lead to improved nutrient levels. A four year, 25 million dollar study conducted by researchers at the Tesco Centre for Organic Agriculture at Newcastle University, United Kingdom found that organically grown foods contain higher levels of cancer fighting and heart healthy antioxidants. The study concluded that, compared to standard commercially grown fruits and vegetables, organic produce has on average 40 percent more antioxidants. Other studies have shown similar results for animal products. Consult Eat Wild at (http://www.eatwild.com/) for similar results pertaining to pastured, organic milk, meat and eggs.

4. Preserve family farms. For every dollar spent on food, approximately a dime goes to the farmer. The remaining 90 cents has a lot to do with profits made by corporations when wholesome food are converted into high calorie, low-nutrient products.

Local growers who find direct sales for their products with restaurateurs, farmers' markets and grocers can get full retail price for their food, meaning they can afford to remain on the land. This maintains the bedrock lifestyle that formed this country. Only one percent of Americans now farm as their primary occupation. Get to know the farmers who grow your food when you join a CSA, buy on the farm or see the growers week after week at market stands. You can ask questions about how your food has been grown, find out how to prepare it and learn what it takes to support non-industrialized food in this country.

5. Help your local economy. Money spent on processed foods and products produced elsewhere does little to sustain your local economy. One study followed the funds spent on food as it persisted in the local economy. It was found that a dollar spent at a supermarket was less than half as valuable in local reinvestment as one spent with an area grower or producer.

You also build an invisible economy of connections, people to people, when you are committed to buying locally. Once you are a regular customer at a locally owned bakery, participate in community gardening, and meet up with the same folks each week at a farmers' market, you'll get to know people who live by similar values. These ties support and sustain communities.

6. Understand ecosystems. By voting with your dollar for locally and often organically grown foods you are swaying the marketplace towards sustainable agricultural practices. Such practices include erosion control, cover crops, windbreaks and habitats for natural pollinators. You are proactively making a difference in supporting viable land use.

When you begin to eat seasonally rather than making do with tasteless raspberries in December you are learning to reconnect with natural rhythms. Other than food they preserved, our ancestors ate exactly what came from the surrounding area. Once you eat local foods you begin to cherish the short time that blueberries are ripe, and may master the art of making jam. Winter may find you enjoying root crops and sturdy grains. Our bodies seem to be more in sync when we live in concert with the seasons.

7. Save genetic diversity. While commercial agribusiness relies on a limited number of seed varieties, often genetically modified and patented, local farms can grow any of thousands of varieties passed down for generations. These hardy stocks provide more than flavor and disease resistance, they also are genetically diverse. The potato famine in Ireland taught farmers to use diverse varieties to prevent tragedy. The new seed varieties of agribusiness do not permit diversity nor seed saving. Heirloom varieties are natural insurance for a changing climate and altering global conditions. They also give us a gift of wonderful taste since we are accustomed to the same few varieties. Ever try Wren's Egg beans, Noir des Carmes melons or Tolman Sweet apples? There are literally thousands of heirloom fruits, vegetables, nuts and grains grown on small farms.

How does one get started?

The concept may seem daunting at first. There's no need to jump in full force. Rather than an all or nothing approach, do what you can and increase your commitment as your comfort level grows.

1. One product at a time. If you are accustomed to a diet of convenience foods then take it in moderation. Every time you shop, replace a category of food on your list that is provided by a distant corporate entity with a local provider. If you normally buy bread from a corporate conglomerate, start buying it locally or make it yourself. In another week or two when you are at ease with that change, make another change. Eventually your shift to local food will be complete without disruption or difficulty.

2. Try something new. Explore farmers' markets, the offerings from ethnic restaurants and new ideas from slow food cookbooks. Oftentimes if you are a member of a CSA, you'll find yourself with an abundance of something you haven't used before. A bumper crop of butternut squash will help you discover curried soups and casseroles you hadn't imagined before you had to deal with this nutrient-packed treasure.

3. Preserve. When you have extra you'll find it worthwhile to freeze, can or dry. You'll notice it is also helpful to double recipes so you can make your efforts worthwhile. Try getting together with friends to make spaghetti sauce, chutney or pies. The results can be an excuse for a party or give you plenty to use later.

4. Share the pleasure. Join or create a network of others who appreciate local food and/or slow food, (www.slowfoodusa.org/) .

5. Proceed wisely. Become acquainted with growing times and growers. Once you are familiar with ripening schedules for raspberries, tomatoes, eggplant and your other favorites get to know local growers by visiting farm stands, farmers' markets and orchards. You can get better prices by buying in bulk, going to pick-your-own farms, asking for seconds (smaller apples, oddly sized potatoes, etc) and bidding at produce auctions. To find local farms, Community Supported Agriculture and stores selling locally produced crops consult Local Harvest at (www.localharvest.org/) .

6. Garden. Homesteaders have been eating local food for years and community gardeners haven't been far behind. If you don't have the space for your own garden, locate one near you through the American Community Gardening Association, (http://www.communitygarden.org/) .

7. Curl up with a book. A number of books on the concept of local eating have sprouted on the bestseller lists. Try "The 100-Mile Diet: A Year of Local Eating" by Alisa Smith and J.B. Mackinnon, "Coming Home to Eat: The Pleasures and Politics of Local Foods" by Gary Paul Nabhan, or "Animal, Vegetable, Miracle" by Barbara Kingsolver.

Buying local food brings the solution back home. It doesn't assume that corporate or political answers will provide the solution. Polls show a majority of us care deeply about the environment and health. Now our day-to-day decisions are beginning to reflect this consciousness. Each time a choice is made to eat healthy, locally grown food we put sustainability on the menu.


 

Picture
 
 
Picture

Years ago my friend Liz described a dream of walking into an expansive dining room set with plates and bowls of amazing artistry. She realized each one was unique and compelling, but there was something more. As she looked closer it occurred to her that each place was specific to an individual. She wandered from place setting to place setting marveling at the color, design and shape of each plate and cup while seeking her own place at the table. If I recall correctly, she woke before finding that place. 

She also woke with the gift of wonderment. Here were some questions that dream evoked. Do we all have a place at the table? Are we aware of the nourishment we give and receive? How do we honor these vessels, our bodies, which take in life’s sustenance? 

We may answer those questions for ourselves in our own ways, but the answers are more complicated for people who struggle with unemployment, illness and family crises.  Those who have made it their life's work to set tables around the world with hand made ceramics both beautiful and useful are Steve and Debra Bures, of
Bures Pottery in Peninsula, Ohio. But their concerns extend to wider issues of sustenance. 

Last year they challenged artists to face down hunger by starting
Cups of Kindness.This art show and sale benefits The Akron-Canton Foodbank   In its first year 150 pieces of artwork were donated by both local and national artists. The logo, photography, site design and hosting---all donated.  Publicity came from bloggers and local press. Thus far, Cups of Kindness has raised enough money to purchase 28,000 meals through the Akron-Canton Foodbank.  

It’s time again. This year’s show will open Saturday, December 5th, 10 to 2, at the Elements Gallery (home to the Bures Pottery studio) and across the street at the Peninsula Art AcademyThe show will continue through January 10, 2010. Check Cups of Kindness for details about online purchases and other ways to help.  

And enjoy Debra Bure’s blog, From Skilled Hands.
She's one of those people who finds an extra helping of beauty and meaning in what others might see as an ordinary serving of life.
 







 

 
 
Picture

Big money gathers eagerly around short-sighted concepts, never bothering to notice the long-term suffering it can cause.  Or maybe that’s an easy way to see the messy collection of hubris, lofty goals, corporate influence and cultural ignorance behind  the
announcement that the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation are calling for a second Green Revolution. They are donating $10.4 million to alleviate hunger using methods including the promotion of genetically modified crops.

The first Green Revolution was not regarded as a success by those “lucky” recipients of First World largess. Their carefully cultivated (often perennial) plantings were torn up and traditional methods well suited for local conditions (rocky hillsides, monsoons, lack of irrigation) ignored. Farmers were provided hybrid seeds which produced astonishing yields on test plots using high quality irrigation and modern intensive farming methods. But these seeds could not be saved to replant the next year. These crops had to be coddled with petroleum-based fertilizer and pesticides. The farmers needed to use equipment no one could afford to repair or fuel.

This first Green Revolution was considered a success by much of the First World. But it failed because it didn’t address, perhaps made worse the larger issue. As Food First explains, the Green Revolution imposed industrial farming methods without addressing unequal access. In South America per capita food supplies went up 8% while the number of hungry people increased 19%. 

Today yields continue to improve around the world. As Sharon Astyk notes in her brilliant blog Casaubon’s Book,“We presently grow enough food to feed 9 billion people.  That’s an astonishing realization for most people – that the world produces about double the number of calories we need.”   

Yet people starve while grain rots in warehouses and famine-struck regions export food. Why? Because it’s not as much about the volume of food as it is about who controls it.

Now, another Green Revolution. This time it’s not just hybrid seeds but genetically modified (GM) crops. These crops are highly profitable to Monsanto, DuPont and other mega corporations.  Typically they require the timed use of specifically matched herbicides and pesticides. But the extra cost of these seeds (and their chemical companions) are a waste because they don’t increase crop yield, despite what the slick PR might allege. Let’s repeat. GM seeds are not the hope of the hungry because no they don’t magically make more food than the seeds nature designed.

The Union of Concerned Scientists  “…reviewed two dozen academic studies of corn and soybeans, the two primary genetically engineered food and feed crops grown in the United States. Based on those studies, the UCS report concluded that genetically engineering herbicide-tolerant soybeans and herbicide-tolerant corn has not increased yields. Insect-resistant corn, meanwhile, has improved yields only marginally. The increase in yields for both crops over the last 13 years, the report found, was largely due to traditional breeding or improvements in agricultural practices.”
  

In fact, organic farms produce consistently high yields with good pest resistance.

And big surprise, traditional farming methods are much more suited to the areas where they've been used. Maybe, just maybe respecting methods that honor the life of the land makes more sense than imposing industrial agriculture. You’d think we humans would have noticed the We Know Better Than Nature approach hasn’t worked out too well. 

A paper  in the African Journal of Food and Nutritional Sciences noted,
"Viable agro-ecology models have been reported in widely disparate places like the United States and India [20]. In the United States, a landmark study by the prestigious National Research Council found that “alternative farmers often produce high per-acre yields with significant reductions in costs per unit of crop harvested, despite the fact that many federal policies discourage adoption of alternative practices”. The Council concluded that Federal commodity programs must be restructured to help farmers realize the full benefits of the productivity gains possible through alternative practices [20].

In South India, a 1993 study was carried out to compare “ecological farms” with matched “conventional” or chemical-intensive farms. Ausubel found that the ecological farms were just as productive and profitable as the chemical ones [21]. He concluded that if extrapolated nationally, ecological farming would have “no negative impact on food security,” and would reduce soil erosion and the depletion of soil fertility while greatly lessening dependence on external inputs."

One would think the world's richest man might put money into solving world hunger through equal access to justice, education and cultural understanding.











 
 
 

 

“Small town values” have been endlessly chanted into the glare of TV cameras by folks who don’t know straw from hay or truth from spin. I may live in a township too tiny to warrant a single stoplight, but I do know that values have more to do with how each of us chooses to live than the way we’re described by politicians or pundits. Every one of our daily choices matter, whether made in the barn or the boardroom. Reawaking small town values, core values I suspect are held by most folks, may be a cure for our national economic woes.

 
Honesty

Spencer Feed & Supply stocks honey from our hives on their shelves. Feed for our cows is ground right there from local grain and the sale of our honey taken off the bill. Even though no money changes hands we still declare the honey as profit on our taxes. It’s a simple matter of conscience. Most of us sense that dishonesty spurred by greed caused our economic crisis. Blame is readily available while those who admit to creating the problems are scarce. Some people around here trace the problem back to dropping the gold standard or relaxing import tariffs. Plenty pin it on hedge funds, risky mortgage products and speculative bubbles across many markets. Chances are they’re all correct.

But right now the focus is on deregulation, a word spoken as if it stinks. What’s missing is honesty about who is responsible. The policies of deregulation and minimal oversight were themselves speculative. (Why is another matter, clearly due to the overlord Greed and his minion, Secrecy.)

Our township isn’t far from big sister Cleveland, where economic misery trickles down like a shared family disorder. Feisty Cleveland was the first city in the nation to pass a predatory-lending law in 2002. That law was toothless because the state had no legal authority to pursue fraudulent lenders. Why? All 50 state attorneys general attempted to protect consumers from predatory and deceptive lenders, in part due to the federal regulatory void, but the Bush administration vehemently prevented the enforcement of state laws. Instead the administration sided with financial institutions, even filing a lawsuit to protect banks from state investigation.

This was detailed in a Washington Post piece titled, “Predatory Lenders' Partner in Crime:How the Bush Administration Stopped the States From Stepping In to Help Consumers” http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/13/AR2008021302783.html?nav=rss_opinion/columns

A few weeks later, thousands of media hours were lavished on a breaking sex scandal by the article’s author, New York Governor Eliot Spitzer. The content of the article was ignored in the typical elevation of ratings over content.

We need a national conscience cleaning The facts must be revealed about how we got in this situation so we can enact safeguards against future economic disasters. And we need to look at the place truth holds in our own lives. If we’re honest with ourselves about what we’re doing and why we’re doing it, we better understand where our priorities are. Our grandmothers may have advised washing a liar’s mouth with soap but that never cleansed the taste of deceit. Telling the truth does that. Besides, I hear soap is full of toxins these days.

 

Reputation 

Here, as in any small town, neighbors lend equipment and help one another out. But if your dealings are unethical folks will remember. That means if you sell wet hay, you won’t have buyers again because everyone knows such hay can sicken livestock or spark a barn fire. Actions demonstrate character.

The same holds true for institutions. When entrusting banks with our accounts we expect a solid reputation. That’s not something an ad can claim, it comes from the bank’s dealings. Our local banks, like First Merit Bank and Farmers Savings Bank, didn’t succumb to slick methods of making money the last decade or two. They stayed with traditional banking practices. No surprise, these institutions are strong as ever.

Banks loaning money deceptively, corporations trading without prudence and individuals taking on excessive debt all knew a time of reckoning would come. It has. The American public is experiencing the disastrous results, and not only job loss and price increases. It’s estimated that one out of four of us owe more on our mortgages than our houses are worth and trillions in retirement savings have evaporated in market “corrections” so far. Hulking fossils like Citigroup and Bank of America have worthless stock and debts exceeding their assets, yet we prolong the date of their extinction with more and more taxpayer money. We’re told that AIG (chomping at another huge government rescue), Wall Street firms and banks took unacceptable, unprecedented risks but ongoing bailouts are essential. Although these behemoths squeezed out other companies by free market rules, now we are told we can’t let them die that way. Their current vegetative state does no one any good. People across the political spectrum are incensed that we are bailing out the same financial giants whose reckless behavior incited our current economic crisis, yet not holding them accountable.

All of us know that those who are not accountable for their actions are, legally, either children or mentally incompetent adults. By that logic, institutions not accountable for their actions should not be in business. Revoke their charters or make taxpayers the new owners. Logic says smaller solid financial institutions that have truly earned decent reputations can replace these lumbering dinosaurs. After all, reputation is all any company truly has to offer.  

 

Self-Reliance and Interdependence  

These traits fold together like the Sunday paper. We can’t get along in small towns or anywhere for that matter without relying on one another. When my father was growing up on the farm, each summer a Huber steam tractor puffed down the road, field to field, followed by farmers who worked together for weeks until the land had yielded her harvest. These days we still help one another out through networks of kinship created in neighborhoods, churches and the local diner. We find the more local we keep these ties the more we remain connected to one another and the outcome.

The same holds true financially. When we keep our financial dealings local and reliant on those we trust we remain in greater control of the results. An Austin, Texas study found that for every $100 a shopper spent at a chain store the local economic impact was only $13. The rest of the money headed straight out of town. But spent at a locally owned retailer, the nearby economy benefited from $45 of that $100.

How does this have anything to do with the state of our national economy? We have little control over our money, as a nation, when we are not reasonably in charge of how it’s spent or where it’s going. There’s little transparency, no proven long-term cap on savings and absolutely no voter input when our more and more government functions are privatized.

Take the military as an example. We’re relentlessly privatizing the military. Major U.S. defense contractor Lockheed Martin fails to adhere to military guidelines on major weapons programs, overwhelming us with cost overruns. Yet we pay Lockheed to run our VA benefits claims appeals program and provide civilian interrogators at Abu Ghraib. They’re not doing a great job at either one.

Halliburton, recipient of billions of dollars in no-bid Pentagon contracts, moved its headquarters to the country of Dubai. Its affiliate military contractor, Kellogg Brown & Root (KBR), increases profits by overspending due to lucrative ‘cost-plus” contracts with the U.S. military. Meanwhile, employees of KBR are hired as contractors through a shell company in the Cayman Islands. Then these workers head off to Iraq or Afghanistan to take jobs our service men and women used to handle. 

This may be small town thinking, but I don’t recall previous wars being privatized or outsourced. Back then Americans served their country directly under government leadership. Many others worked to manufacture the necessary food, clothing and weaponry for companies based here in the U.S. Maybe that’s why wartime boosted the economy, just as keeping the dollars local in Austin benefited more than the shop owners.

 

Hard Work  It’s common to hear tractors running well after dark around here because many farmers have full time jobs in addition to agriculture. Their work generates the food that sustains a nation. Still, farmers have to auction off their herds or leave the land altogether when they can’t make ends meet. It’s estimated that 330 family farms are lost every week. That’s tragic for all of us.

Americans are hard workers. We put in longer hours and have fewer paid vacation days than most industrialized nations. Worker productivity remains high. But real wages are down and for those of us dealing with unemployment, the remaining jobs out there pay less and provide fewer benefits than they did a few years ago. When hard work no longer equals a living wage, it’s as if the ground cannot yield food.

Recent figures show that U.S. incomes in the lower 90 percent of the economic ladder went down slightly while the top one percent saw gains of at least 14 percent. And 14 percent of a millionaire’s worth is a lot of money.

It seems hard work is no longer tied to earnings. CEO’s go from one high paying position to another. No matter if they’re leaving a company in shambles, they stroll off with giant bonuses and perks. And the same financiers and economic experts who led institutions to ruin appear are handling the trillions in bailout money. That doesn’t sit well here in the heartland. I can’t imagine it goes over well anywhere. 

 


Those who imply that residents of small towns are somehow more authentically American don’t fool us. We’re all Americans. The values we believe in may be too numerous to list but we know they only come alive when we live them each day. That doesn’t mean we always behave well. We’re angry and we do have pitchforks.

 

 

 sources

http://www.sustainabletable.org/issues/familyfarms/ “ Family Farms” Sustainable Table blog  (loss of farms per week) 

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/03/AR2008060303490.html?nav=rss_business  US Lockheed Faulted for Failure to Control Costs” by Dana Hedgpeth Washington Post  Wednesday, June 4, 2008; Page D01

http://blog.cleveland.com/openers/2008/07/thousands_of_veterans_may_have.html  “Thousands of veterans may have been denied payments, Kucinich report says”

by Stephen Koff   The Plain Dealer   July 15, 2008 11:56AM  (Lockheed handling VA claims) 

http://www.liveablecity.org/lcfullreport.pdf  “Economic Impact Analysis: A Case Study Local Merchants vs Chain Retailers by Civic Economics”  December 2002     (Austin TX study) 

http://www.cleveland.com/plaindealer/stories/index.ssf?/base/business-8/1222849945238061.xml&coll=2   “Cuyahoga County predatory-lending epidemic was early sign U.S. financial crisis loomed”  by Teresa Dixon Murray and Mark Gillispie   The Plain Dealer  Wednesday, October 01, 2008 

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/13/AR2008021302783.html?nav=rss_opinion/columns  

“Predatory Lenders' Partner in CrimeHow the Bush Administration Stopped the States From Stepping In to Help Consumers”  by Eliot Spitzer  Washington Post  Thursday, February 14, 2008; Page A25